From the General's Desk
January 8, 2016
Puerto Rico Recap: Some But Not All
On Monday, January 5th, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico paid nearly $595 million in debt service due on 1-1-2016. Some payments were made by the drawdown on reserve funds while some from monies “clawed back” from other sources whose revenues had been dedicated to those bondholders.
Unfortunately, the Commonwealth defaulted on $37 million in interest payments owed by the Puerto Rico Infrastructure Finance Authority (PRIFA) ($35.9 million) and the Puerto Rico Finance Corporation (PRFC) ($1.4 million). Much to some bondholders’ chagrin, the PRIFA trust indenture contains no language as to an event of default, leaving investors with the limited remedy of pursuing legal enforcement of their rights. Bond insurers have picked up some of the delinquency ($10 million). However, insurers continue to contest the government’s diversion of revenues to pay not only essential services (a move we can understand even if we disagree on it) and to award $120 million in Christmas bonuses (an action we consider totally unacceptable in light of the present circumstances).
Congress, at long last, has taken up the gauntlet in response to Puerto Rico’s cry for assistance and long-needed overhaul of the Commonwealth’s infrastructure. Given the historic snail’s pace of the federal government (only just now has Congress announced hearings on the crisis will begin in February) and the distractions of an election year, the likelihood of any meaningful action in the near term would appear to be more of a pipe dream than any sort of a shoo-in. The only winners right now are the lawyers who will be having a heyday “duking” matters out in court for some time to come.
There was a time when such events would have roiled the markets for days, even weeks and months. Remember the WPPSS default in 1984? Contrast that with today’s environment where the market just seems to roll along with a ho-hum attitude. Have we become so desensitized to the lack of political will to pay as to think it is business as usual? Or instead has the plethora of modern communications allowed investors access to information and early warning signs not previously available and thus be able to prepare, for better or worse? I think it is a little of each. Certainly astute investors over the last year or so have had plenty of data to indicate it was time to get out of their Puerto Rico holdings. For those that choose, either overtly or through a proxy (i.e. mutual fund) not to exit this market, suffering the consequences of inaction will surely haunt them in the days ahead. The roller coast ride in Commonwealth bond prices that began almost four years ago will likely continue and any ultimate recoveries will most likely be just pennies on the dollar.
Now for the good news. Overall the municipal market has shaken off Puerto Rico’s default as an isolated situation. The market’s optimism is due primarily to the improving finances of most other state and local governments coupled with more investors seeking to participate in what some say is today’s portfolio “sweet spot”. Bloomberg News reports that the “January effect lives on, as municipal bond funds flush with cash.” 1
From a credit perspective, 2016 will likely be a pivotal one for most market participants. With the implementation of the best execution rule (MSRB Rule G-18), the small investor will, hopefully, gain access to a more level playing field, at least when it comes to transactions. Disclosures under GASB 67 & 68 are now commonplace in most issuer financial filings, revealing pension and OPEB liabilities previously hidden to layman eyes, and soon-to-be mandated price transparency protocols should significantly improve the valuation process.
It goes without saying that the best way to dodge a bullet is to not be its line of fire. Should one find oneself in such a situation, having sufficient reaction time is a crucial component to survival. The advances in disclosure measures over the past few years have provided sufficient time for investors to dodge potential credit challenges to say nothing of the recent defaults (Stockton, Detroit, San Bernardino, Puerto Rico, etc.). Going forward, pension reform will likely dominate municipal credit headlines including the possible further credit downgrades to Illinois, New Jersey and other pension-strapped state governments. Conflicting court rulings on voter reform initiatives (i.e. City of San Diego) will also create uncertainty in this sector. Likewise the oil-price tumble has caused significant revenue shortfall in many states including Alaska, Texas, and Oklahoma. Investors can expect more headline news as these states will struggle to adopt unprecedented measures in order to repair their respective state budgets. These two sectors aside, the market overall is expected to be a year of benign credit issues. But one should not become comfortable when it comes to credit analysis despite the improved environment. We all need to be reminded periodically that complacency often underestimates the risks and obscures the need to be constantly vigilant.
I have been encouraged by the formation of a multi-faceted group of market professionals in response to MCDC 2 and the MSRB’s creation of the Investor Advisory Group3 along with improved state communication tools like California’s Debtwatch4 rolled out late last year by the Treasurer’s Office. These collective efforts should help to bring more transparency about issuance, consistency in loan documents, and relevant and productive self- imposed regulations. Therefore, as we say farewell to 2015, we raise a toast to 2016 that it may be a year of cooperation, accountability and practical innovation.
Author, By Betsy Shelton, Director of Research / Sr. Portfolio Manager.
1Bloomberg News, January 5, 2016
The contents herein are for informational purposes only, and under no circumstances are they to be construed as a recommendation of a solicitation. The information and opinions herein are subject to change without notice and CFI does not undertake to advise the reader of changes in opinion or information.
© 2019 copyright by Charles Fish Investments, Inc. All rights reserved. Website design by TC Two Creative.
2010 Main Street | Suite 320
Irvine, California 92614
Phone: 949 296 3970
Charles Fish Investments, Inc. (CFI) founded in 1984, is a Registered Investment Advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Act of 1940 and notice filed with the California Department of Business Oversight. The firm, which is wholly-owned by its employees, is not affiliated with any broker/dealer. CFI's revenues are derived exclusively from the fees received for the investment advisory and/or management services provided.
ADV Part 2 A